Sirisia Jubilee MP John Waluke
NAIROBI, Kenya
If political irony were a sport, Sirisia MP John Waluke would be leading the league table this week.
The lawmaker, elected on a Jubilee Party ticket led by former President Uhuru Kenyatta, now says the same party leader is secretly bankrolling the opposition.
Which raises a simple administrative question: is this a case for disciplinary action—or just advanced political gymnastics?
if Waluke truly believes Jubilee’s party leader is funding rival camps, then staying put in the same outfit begins to look less like loyalty and more like… extended confusion.
By that logic, should Jubilee show him the door and let the people of Sirisia decide again in a by-election?
Or is this one of those situations where everyone pretends not to notice the contradiction because Kenyan politics thrives on exactly this kind of plot twist?
Speaking at a public event in Bungoma County,Waluke alleged that Kenyatta is quietly supporting opposition figures to undermine President William Ruto.
Evidence, however, was not part of the package—just conviction, delivered with the confidence of a man who knows headlines don’t require footnotes.
Kenyatta, who has recently maintained a low profile while occasionally resurfacing for regional peace efforts and carefully worded national reflections, has not responded.
Perhaps he is busy financing the opposition. Or perhaps, more mundanely, he is minding his business—an activity that rarely trends.
Opposition figures, for their part, have stuck to their usual script: rising cost of living, governance concerns and the small matter of actually opposing the government.
External sponsorship, they suggest, is not the storyline—though in Kenya’s political theatre, scripts are known to change mid-performance.
Analysts note that such accusations are as common as roadside billboards in an election season preview.
With 2027 slowly appearing on the horizon, statements like Waluke’s serve less as revelations and more as opening moves in a long chess game—one where everyone accuses everyone else of moving unseen pieces.
Still, the Jubilee dilemma lingers. Can a party comfortably host a member who publicly accuses its leader of political double-dealing?
Or does this fall under the unwritten rule of Kenyan politics: contradiction is not a bug, it’s a feature?
For now, Waluke remains in place—critic, member, and perhaps the most unexpected whistleblower against his own political landlord.
Whether Jubilee acts or shrugs may tell voters more than the allegation itself.
Expel Him or Explain Him? Waluke’s Uhuru Claims Put Jubilee in an awkward Spot
